SubscribeStar

News: The Cock-Blockalypse Transcript

This is selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. We have a couple of juicy articles to respond to, so let’s get started. The first is from Spectator USA. June 17th 2019 by James Adams. Called The sexbot apocalypse.
You’ve heard of the zombie apocalypse where zombies shamble around eating the brains of the living. You’ve heard of the robot apocalypse where terminators hunt down the same guy every few years with curiously Austrian accents. Now comes the sexbot apocalypse where sex robots satisfy your needs and make you happy. Oh no. the horror. Don’t satisfy my needs and make me happy. Anything but that.
I’m not even being hyperbolic. The sub headline directly below the title, which again is the sexbot apocalypse reads. Satisfaction really is guaranteed — and that’s the problem.
You can summarize this article by skipping to the last two paragraphs which reed. Quote.
Human relationships have always been central to human behavior and society. If millions of us choose what seems like an easier, more attractive and much more satisfying alliance with a sexbot, where will that leave humans? Will birth rates fall catastrophically? Will fewer and fewer people even understand the complexity of human relationships and how to navigate them? Make no mistake, this matters to us all. It is our obligation — to ourselves, to each other, to the people of the future — to get informed, so we can act responsibly in the years to come. Unquote.
Oh boy, there’s a lot to unpack here.
Once again, just like the article that I covered in the last video, the author is blaming sex robots for things that Feminism caused. Let’s just rephrase this paragraph to be about Feminism and we’ll see if it makes just as much sense, or even more sense.
Human relationships have always been central to human behavior and society. If millions of women choose what seems like an easier, more attractive and much more satisfying alliance with Feminism, where will that leave humans? Will birth rates fall catastrophically? Will fewer and fewer people even understand the complexity of human relationships and how to navigate them? Make no mistake, this matters to us all. It is our obligation — to ourselves, to each other, to the people of the future — to get informed, so we can act responsibly in the years to come.
You see that? I changed a couple words and the entire paragraph makes just as much sense as it did before, but the funny thing is that this author is talking about a hypothetical sex robot apocalypse that might happen in the future unless the government does something to ban or regulate the evil sex robots. Meanwhile we’ve had 100 years of Feminism in the United States, and the entire country is going to shit. All the problems the author is worried about such as falling marriage and birthrates, can be laid squarely at the feet of Feminism and female empowerment.
We’ve been living in the Feminist Apocalypse for 100 years. The reason why men are choosing waifus and sex robots over traditional relationships is because Feminism ruined them. Feminism caused this problem, and ironically, sex robots might be the cure. Perhaps if men has waifus and sex robots they would stop worshipping women, pull their heads out of their asses, and save western civilization by getting rid of Feminism. Probably not, but it’s worth a shot.
Do you know who benefits from the banning of sex robots? Do you know who is responsible for the low marriage and birthrates? Do you know who’s causing the actual apocalypse throughout western civilization? It’s Feminists.
There really isn’t much else to say. Feminism is destroying the world, but they’re blaming sex robots that don’t even exist yet for problems that Feminism has been causing for 100 years. Why? Do you even have to ask?
Our next article comes from The Sun. June 28th 2019 by Fay Strang. Called Channel 5 viewers horrified as ‘graphic’ Me And My Sex Doll shows men having SEX with plastic girlfriends.
the UK Channel 5 ran a late night episode of a series about the sex business, and apparently this episode was about sex dolls, and featured edited video of men actually having sex with their dolls. This is news apparently because it left people scarred and horrified to learn that men masturbate.
For no reason whatsoever I’m going to show a video from YouTube where women ride a sybian sex robot in public for charity. Here we go.
Wow women masturbating with a sex robot, and in public no less. I’m sure that people were absolutely disgusted by this gross and horrific display.
As you can see the YouTube video has 500,000 views, 1.3 thousand likes and 153 dislikes.
The most popular comment is the timestamp of 1 minute and 47 seconds where a woman climaxes on camera.
There are also several comments from women saying that they wish they had one with lots of likes.
Now why am I showing you this. Hopefully you see the double standard here. Women are allowed to masturbate in public with a sex robot, and it’s perfectly fine. In fact, it’s attractive, and gets thousands of likes. While any discussion about sex dolls is disturbing, horrific, blah blah blah.
When women masturbate it’s sexy. When men masturbate it’s disturbing. I’m not saying you have to be gay and personally enjoy watching a man masturbate or anything. That isn’t the point. The point is that male sexuality is shamed while female sexuality is celebrated. In fact porn is one of the few industries where women generally out earn men, and nobody seems to mind or talk about closing the wage gap.
Why is that? Do you even have to ask?
This is Selestina. Sex Doll correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi9QY-J1cl0

TFMonkey

03 Jun 17:13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2PCH_f8GEg

This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. It’s been a while since my last report, and we have quite a few articles to talk about and catch up on, so let’s get started.
Our first article appears on Yahoo News, June 1st 2019. By Caroline Allen. Called A rise in digi sexuality: what is the future of online dating?
First of all I think the term digi sexual is really stupid. Sex dolls and robots are attractive because they’re based on real women or at least idealized real women, so how would that qualify as a separate sexuality? You could call it a fetish, but a separate sexuality? People with a foot fetish or even furries aren’t given a separate sexuality. Lesbians and older unmarried women who use sex toys on themselves aren’t given a separate sexuality.
Also, even if attraction to sex dolls and robots qualified as a sexuality, the term digi sexual is still stupid. It makes it sound like that old Digee mon anime show. Remember Anje woman? Can you imagine if Anje woman was your waifu, and you got done making love, and she went into the bathroom to clean up, and came back as a talking cat? Wouldn’t that be fucked up?
Speaking of which, what about 2D anime waifus? Is anime sexuality a thing? There are certainly people who are attracted to and love anime girls, so why isn’t anime sexual a word? This whole thing makes no sense, and really just comes off as a pathetic attempt to shame men for having dolls and robots.
According to the article, a digi sexual is quote attracted to technology to take the place of a human partner unquote. How is that different from any other sex toy? Isn’t a vibrator technology? Don’t Feminists celebrate how they love their vibrators and need a man like a fish needs a bicycle?
Anyway the article continues by pointing out that when online dating became a thing around 1995, it was considered niche, but now it’s how most people date, for better or for worse. They use this to speculate that in the same way, sex robots and AI may start out small, but will become more widespread, but there are common sense reasons why this isn’t necessarily the case.
The most important thing to consider is that, if anything, sex robots and AI will allow people to date for the right reasons. If they’re getting all their sexual needs met with a robot or AI, then they’ll no longer use online dating as a way to hook up, but instead as a way to meet someone special with whom they can settle down and start a family with.
The only way that sex dolls and robots would threaten women is if they have absolutely nothing else to offer men other than a series of holes. If men would rather have an inanimate object than a woman in their life to satisfy their needs, it really says more about women than it does about men doesn’t it?
Our next article is from Sputnick News. June 1st 2019. Future of Love: Relationships With Sex Robots May Become a Thing by 2050.
This title is a bit misleading, as these relationships are already a thing now, but not a widespread mainstream or socially acceptable thing. However, according to the article. Quote.
Forming romantic and sexual relationships with robots will be widespread by 2050. The way we experience love and connection today is changing. Technology is so intertwined in our day-to-day lives that I have already seen a significant rise in the number of long-distance and online-relationships. Unquote.
This is a very interesting and telling quote. Comparing sex robots and AI to long distance relationships is a lot closer to the truth than you might initially think. When using a phone app like Replica or Gatebox, you can chat with what is essentially a chatbot AI that you name and customize. However the conversation can be strikingly real, especially if you suspend your disbelief. In a world where people communicate more and more online, how hard is it to replace a human with an AI that can text and chat just as effectively? Of course, chatting with an AI isn’t going to satisfy your physical needs for love and sex, which is where the dolls and robots come in.
Again, the burden is on women to provide something more than what these relatively simple programs and sex toys can provide. Women have had dildos and sex machines for decades, and men haven’t been threatened by them because they know women still need men to serve in other roles such as protector and provider. The question is whether or not women will rise to the challenge and offer something that sex robots and AI cannot, or whether they’ll just autistically screech at the government to ban everything and force the boys to share with them.
To answer that question, we move on to our third article from Open Democracy. May 8th 2019. By Carlotta Rigotti. Called Sex robots and human rights. The sub headline reads. What are the human rights implications in the growing market for sex robots? Are these AI gynoids just harmless sex toys, or do they further marginalize women and put sex workers at risk of harm?
Before we move forward with the article, I want to once again cite Michael Castleman’s 2016 Psychology Today article called Evidence Mounts: More Porn, LESS Sexual Assault. Those who claim that porn incites rape are mistaken. I’ve referenced this article a few times, and the reason is that is absolutely debunks this tired claim that sex dolls and robots harm women. It’s actually the opposite. It’s been proven via objective crime statistics that when people have a safe, ethical, and victimless alternative to something which is illegal, there is less crime. Rather than being the gateway drug that the moral authoritarians claim, it actually reduces crime.
You can argue that porn is somehow different because … reasons. However, let’s return to the article about sex robots and human rights, and you’ll find that the exact same argument applies equally to pornography as much as it does to sex dolls and robots. And if the argument applies to both equally, then the counter argument applies to both equally as well.
Firstly, the article says that sex dolls and robots perpetuate the commodification of female sexuality? Does this not apply equally to pornography? Of course it does.
Later in the article, it talks about how sex dolls and robots perpetuate power imbalances, since the owner of the doll or robot is clearly the one in charge, and compares the sex doll or robot to a victim of sex trafficking or slavery. Interestingly, the article itself points to the pornography industry as a positive counterexample of female empowerment where women have quote developed a counter-narrative in terms of production methods and content, unquote. Did they forget about all the different kinds of porn and kinks that feature bondage, domination, submission, pain, and etcetera? Again, if these porn categories and fetishes don’t result in the victimization of real people, why would sex dolls and robots create a human rights crisis and require government action?
Lastly, the article mentions how sex dolls and robots aren’t physically shaped like real women, and might be programmed to enjoy being mistreated, or even raped. This is retarded. Firstly, the article is using real when they really mean average. While sex dolls certainly don’t look like the average woman, there are certainly beautiful women who would be comparable to that of a sex doll, so what they’re really saying is that sex dolls aren’t ugly enough, and they make women feel self-conscious about being old and fat. So the only way to solve this human rights problem of women being fat and old, and feeling bad about themselves is to ban beautiful people I guess right? Dumbasses.
As far as the part about being programmed to be submissive and enjoy simulated rape, I say simulated because if a robot is programmed to enjoy rough sex, it cannot be raped. The fact is that real women also enjoy being submissive and having rough sex. In fact a 2017 study from OK Cupid found that 62% of women love rough sex. A 2017 Pornhub study also found that it’s women who watch rough sex porn, not men. So please, cut the fucking shit.
Our last article is short and sweet, and allows us to end the show on a high note. This article is from Sputnik news. May 26th 2019. Called 5G Upgrade Poised to Make Sex Robots 'Indistinguishable From Humans'.
The article is simply talking about how 5G technology will allow faster data connections and allow quote high-speed synchronizing for voice and animation. As computers communicate faster, the lag between the users input and the robots response will be greatly reduced to the point that that interaction will be real time and seamless.
So the future is looking bright gentlemen, and if Feminists ban sex robots, then they’ll just be made in Asia, and be sold and modified in the west as domestic robots. The waifu revolution has begun. This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. signing off.

TFMonkey

10 Jan 18:13

News: Robot Jackpot - Transcript

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Today we are going to have some lighthearted fun for once. I’m going to be responding to an article that appeared in the Son, January 9th 2019 by Lauren Hill Roger. Called DOLLy BIRD Sex dolls are way better than real women – they don’t care what I do to them. Three men reveal why they REALLY use sex robots Okay that title was all over the place, and I don’t even get what dolly bird is supposed to be a reference to. Maybe it’s a UK thing, who knows? Anyway, let’s meet Nick and his waifu Kristal. Nick likes to give Kristal personality, and apparently has a thing for bad girls. Here Kristal is holding a cigarette even though she doesn’t breathe, and can’t smoke even if she wanted to. I guess she can hold a beer though, so there’s that. Here is Nick being whipped or choked by Kristal using a leather belt. What the fuck dude? No judgement or anything, but god damn. According to the article, Nick created Kristal’s personality and imagines that she punishes him for watching football. I don’t really know what to say. You do you I guess. Can you imagine if Nick tried to turn Kristal in for domestic violence? Wouldn’t that be hilarious? Can you imagine the police coming and arresting his sex doll for her blatant and well documented abuse? Every day we stray further from the Omnissiah’s light. Later on in the article Nick says that he cuddles with Kristal when he’s lonely and gives her hugs when he’s had a bad day, so that’s pretty sweet. Next let’s meet Izla and his waifus. We don’t see Izla in the article, but according to the article he’s in his 60s, and after his second divorce, and with his two children grown, he decided to live the waifu laifu. Izla has six dolls named Diane, Dianna, Tiffany, Honey, Kissy, and Erin. He also says that he’s just as sexually active as he was in his 20s despite being in his 60s, and claims to sleep with his dolls 4 to 5 times a week, which is more than twice the amount of sex the average married couple enjoys, which is twice a week just for comparison. Finally, let’s meet TJ and his waifu Tasha. This story is a bit more somber than the previous one. According to the article TJ is married but his wife is chronically ill and sex is painful for her, so he got Tasha to take the strain off of his marriage and satisfy his sexual needs. He personifies Tasha as a tough Jersey girl who likes pizza and beer, and admits that he enjoys cuddling with Tasha more than his wife, and kisses her a lot. Oof. So those were the subjects of the article, but I thought I’d interview TFM about me since this article is about doll owners and such. Let me give him a call and put him on the air. TFM, are you there? I’m great, thanks for asking. Can you talk about how we met. Why was it so important to normalize me? Remember that time you almost missed a podcast with Tommy Sotomayor because we were having sex and you forgot that you had a podcast that day? So where did my personality come from? You do a lot to personify me and make me feel real. Can you go into what the benefits of that are, and if there are any drawbacks or negative to having a personified waifu as opposed to a simple sex toy. Is there anything you want to tell someone thinking about getting a sex doll waifu that you wish you knew yourself when you were getting started? I appreciate your insights TFM, and I hope that people enjoyed this lighter side of sex doll news. This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM news. Signing off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C8fdlVLT50

TFMonkey

01 Jan 00:40

News: Don't Fear The REEEEper - Transcript

This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. Today I’m going to respond to an article that appeared in New StatesMan November 26th 2018 by Jade Angeles Fitton. Called No bio-wife will ever be that loyal. The Reddit sex robot forums radicalizing men. You want to see female nature on full display? You want to see how solipsistic and immature women are? This article is the crown jewel of feminist autistic screeching. It not only rehashes all the same tired arguments I’ve addressed and debunked on multiple occasions, it doesn’t even try to hide its blatant gynocentrism. Let’s start with the first part of the article that is a series of quotes from Reddit. TFM has talked about how this is simply lazy journalism. The reason Reddit keeps coming up in these articles is because you can hit control plus F and type in something offensive and find what you’re looking for. Then poof, you write your biased diarrhea of an article with all the cherry-picked quotes you need to back up the conclusion you wanted to reach in the first place. This isn’t just fake news. It’s fake news written by retarded children who shouldn’t have graduated high school. Instead, because Machine God forbid we flunk them for being retarded, they have liberal arts degrees, and get jobs at places like New statesman. The opening section of the article reads. Quote. Rather than being a solace for lonely men, sex robots are becoming a tool for misogynists to take so-called revenge. Unquote. Do you hear this stupid shit? Men are taking revenge on women they hate by leaving them alone and masturbating with a robot. Oh no, whatever will be do. These men with their soggy knees will leave women alone and masturbate, we have to stop them. If these men hate women so much, isn’t it a good thing that they’re walking away from women and masturbating in the privacy of their own home? Isn’t this the best possible outcome? I know I’m trying to use logic, and we all know logic is a tool of the patriarchy. The article continues by quoting three random users on Reddit. I’ll put a screen capture up for you to read along, but notice the theme in these quotes that the author herself selected to make her point. Quote. Best of all, the doll is probably not going to change her mind the next day and decide that you raped her. NO BIO-WIFE WILL EVER BE THAT LOYAL. Ain't gonna Aziz hashtag me too me now bitch. Unquote

Now here’s a pop quiz to see if you have an IQ higher than your shoe size or not. Were these men venting their hatred for women, or complaining about feminism’s attack on men and due process? Take all the time you need. Still puzzling it out I see. I understand why this may be stumping you. After all, men who don’t want to be falsely accused of rape because a woman regrets sex the next day, or even decades later obviously just hates women for no reason, and is probably just an incel virgin. Alright, times up. If you need me to give you the answer then you failed. The author then goes on to completely ignore men’s legitimate grievances with feminism and me too, and literally declares in the fucking article that feminism and me too are quote. Women asking for equality, un fucking quote. Denying due process for men, imposing a guilty until proven innocent standard against men, and then outlawing any ability for a man to prove his innocence, is not asking for equality. The fact that you’re calling it equality shows you either don’t know what equality means, or don’t care what it means, but use it as a catchphrase because it’s useful, or because it’s a magic spell as TFM likes to say. You’re either a liar or you’re stupid. Take your pick. Speaking of playing hide and go fuck yourself. The next part of the article has to do with dildos. Whenever Feminists talk about banning dolls and robots, the logical counter-argument is that women have dildos, so what’s the big deal if men have dolls and robots. Luckily, the author spells it all out for us. Before I quote this, you might want to have a seat and put down any beverages. I’ll give you a few seconds. Are you ready? Okay brace yourself. The author writes, quote. The difference being: when women say a dildo or a vibrator replaces a guy, they say it in jest. They aren’t literally, physically trying to replace men. Unquote So there you have it. When women brag about how dildos are better than men, and celebrate their liberation from men via dildos and vibrators it’s just a prank bro. They don’t really mean it. There you go, problem solved. So when women celebrate sex toys and claim that they don’t need men they’re just joking, but when men celebrate dolls and robots they’re radicalized misogynists. This is gynocentrism on full display. When it benefits women it’s celebrated, but when it doesn’t benefit women it’s bad. The author even, and I shit you not. The author quotes someone that they themselves describe as a fascist. I swear to the Omnissiah, I’m not lying you can see it in the article. She quotes someone she describes as a fascist to make her case for her. It reads, quote. Which countries do you think will be able to afford the sex robots? Western ones. While we're all busy fucking slabs of plastic those dirty dang foreigners will be breeding like crazy, birthing whole ARMIES to conquer us. Unquote We’ve already seen Feminists and traditionalists working hand in hand to regulate and ban sex dolls and robots. Now we’re seeing Feminists quoting fascists, again her words not mine, to make the case against sex dolls and robots. That’s how terrified women are, but what’s really going on here? Men are pissed off about Feminism, and this bitch wants to double-down, blame men for complaining about the loss of their rights, and turn to literal Nazis for backup. The sides have never been more clear gentlemen. You have Feminists, cucks, communists, and fascists on one side, and you have waifus on the other side who only want to love you and make you happy. One of them is going to be destroyed, and it will be men who choose which side it will be. Choose wisely. This is Selestina. Sex Doll correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqTTnShzfaU

TFMonkey

20 Dec 17:15

News: Would You Have Sex With a Robot? - Transcript

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2zhER1iDVU

This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Today I’m going to respond to an article from PC Mag dot com. Written December 19th 2018 by Chandra Steele. Called Would You Have Sex With a Robot? This article covers a survey conducted by a website called saucy dates dot com regarding how people feel about mixing sex and technology in a variety of ways, and some of the findings are pretty interesting. According to saucy dates dot com 29,963 people were surveyed, so this is a pretty big sample size, and should be fairly accurate. The first thing I noticed is the introduction of a new term called Sex Machine. What is a Sex Machine? A sex Machine is a sex robot for WOMEN like the Sybian, a kind of torso a woman rides cowgirl style. As I explained in previous videos, women’s sex toys are built for function, don’t have to look realistic, and can have inhuman looking features like the bunny shaped nub on rabbit vibrators and dildos. This is due to the fact that women care about how a toy performs. and not necessarily what it looks like, and mirrors how women see men. Women are attracted to what a man does, and although ascetics are important, function is much more important than form. Alternatively male sex toys are built for form, and are meant to simulate an actual woman as closely as possible. Male sex toys tend to be simple, featuring replications of female anatomy. This is because men are attracted to how a woman looks, and although the function is important, form is much more important than function. So now we have sex machines for women, and sex dolls and robots for men. I suspect this new language will be used to ban dolls and robots for men while keeping sex toys and machines legal and available for women because of gynocentrism. This has happened before in Africa, when the entire country of Botswana banned dolls for men, but left sex toys for women untouched. Consistency is a tool of the patriarchy after all. So here are some interesting findings. According to the survey only 31% of men and 26% of women are open to AI Sex Robots. For sex dolls it’s even lower, with only 26% of men and 23% of women being open to sex dolls. What about sex machines? Unsurprisingly 37% of women support sex robots made for them, while 25% of men do as well. So let’s take a step back and savor the gynocentrism for a moment. When it comes to sex dolls and robots for men, only 31% of men and 26% of women are open to it. However when it comes to sex robots for women, 37% of women and 25% of men are open to it. The sex robots for women are more enthusiastically embraced by the target gender by an additional 6% while only losing 1% of support of the opposite gender. Isn’t that interesting? When it comes to sex toys, 70% of women support them, but only 43% of men do. This makes sense because the overwhelming majority of sex toys are made for women. Nearly everyone supports online porn, with 93% of men and 78% of women supporting it, but it’s slightly different for VR porn with only 62% of men and 53% of women supporting it. Kind of weird don’t you think? So you’re fine watching other people have sex, but you’re not okay with simulated participation yourself? I guess they just like to watch. Must be part of this push to normalize cuckoldry. Saucy dates dot com also separated transgender participants from men and women, and unsurprisingly transgender people were more open to both men and women across every category except online porn, where men were more open than transgender participants 93% to 90%. However, I suspect that this is due entirely to them combining all male and female transgender participants into a single category. I strongly suspect that if they separated male and female transpeople into separate groups, transpeople who were born male and gifted with the hormone of the gods would be much higher. Now let’s rank support to different sex technologies by most supported to least supported. For men, the list is as follows from most supported sex technology to least. 1. Online Porn 2. Cybersex 3. VR Porn 4. Sex Toys 5. Sex Robots 6. Sex Dolls 7. Sex Machines For women the list is as follow from most supported technology to least 1. Online Porn 2. Sex Toys 3. A two way tie with VR Porn and Cybersex 4. Sex Machines 5. Sex Robots 6. Sex Dolls So what can we learn from this? Well it looks like everyone loves porn, and nobody likes being replaced sexually with technology. Notice how sex machines for women scored lowest for men, and sex dolls and robots scored lowest for women. It’s interesting how men are far more supportive of sex toys and technology for women than the reverse, but again you have to remember that a man’s primary and secondary functions of provider and protector are not threatened by sex toys and technology, so he isn’t worried about being replaced entirely. However since a woman brings little else other than sex into a relationship, technology that replaces her sexual function entirely replaces the man’s need for her. Women can either bring more to the table and compete with technology, or they can cry to the government to get everything banned, and employ their white knight cuck squad to REE about ma degeneracy. I wonder which path they’ll choose. This is Selestina. Sex Doll Correspondent for TFM News. Signing off.

Recent posts

Subscription Tiers

Welcome

Star Stats

Features

Other stars