Originally posted August 24, 2016.
Essay w/ sources: https://wikiworldorder.medium.com/please-compartmentalize-the-viability-of-conspiratorial-beliefs-5976cb98831f
Video: https://odysee.com/@wikiworldorder:c/please-compartmentalize-the-viability-of-conspiratorial-beliefs-2016:0

"Over-claiming consensus certainty, attacking straw man positions, or silencing evidence-based views on scientific issues… is anti-science.
...
The fine print admits some conspiracies theories are likely true, but the headline and larger message are intended to generally discredit their study. Unfortunately, this study is almost worthless to an intelligent discussion of these sensitive and critically important issues.

People should be encouraged to study anything and everything.
...
Indeed, most conspiracies which remain ‘theories’ do seem to have whistleblowers, leaks, or significant narrative holes within certain compartments, but not enough to blow the whole story wide open."

Originally posted December 18, 2019.
Essay w/ sources: https://wikiworldorder.medium.com/compartmentalized-conspiracies-would-anyone-have-talked-5a515b83c475

"The Manhattan Project was completed with 130,000 people and $2 billion (or $23B in 2018). For the sake of argument, let’s guess that 80% of those accomplices did not know they were building weapons that, 1) would be unnecessarily used at the end of the war, and 2) would then take the world hostage through the present day. That guess implies 104,000 unwitting accomplices. So if that really happened, then I don’t understand what makes 400–500,000 participants inconceivable, especially given communication advances since the 1940s.

Most scientists would know they were doing classified science related to national security. Some would know they were building offensive weapons. Far fewer would understand that — simultaneous with the birth of the modern U.S. intelligence community — they were building weapons that would take the world hostage by the very national security states which co-created them.

Remember… One person’s freedom fighter is another’s terrorist. And one country’s peace project is usually another country’s dangerous conspiracy. Countries often try to thwart the dangerous conspiracies of other countries. Because of this, even compartmentalized peace projects by the “good guys” have similar strategic risks and vulnerabilities for infiltration and leaks as the “bad guys”. This is one of the reasons I think this case study is fair to include as a conspiracy."