DELICIOUS #Vegan Meals 4 Lean Muscle! #LiftingTheVeil #Veganism

 
Make sure to like, subscribe and hit the bell notifications button for full films and more videos! access my free UNCENSORED TRUTH archives @ 

Endocrine Toxicology, Population Gendercide & Animal Foods: Please Share!

It's Interesting to find if the correlations being the same in our fellow human peacocks, just as the bird kingdom, strutting and prancing their vibrant vivid colors just as the flamboyant or "flaming" flamingo with its flamenco style of flash and flare that male birds use to attract mates and signal the flame of love. 

Dont jump to conclusions, though, im not homophobic and theres absolutely nothing wrong with being gay, it does not infringe universal law, insomuch as it follows and abides by the individual's NATURAL RIGHTS of FREE WILL CHOICE WHICH SHALL NEVER BE INFRINGED! Those rights of free will choice to live freely and to not be harmed also extends to the animal kingdom as well!


The harm comes when the subliminal influence on the ILLUSION of "free will choice" is inflicted from environment, propagated via top-down cultural propaganda machines and industrial corporate cabals who have a vested cultural "eugenics" program running, based on principles of social darwinism (what I like to call "death by diet" or quite simply SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST) and certain marxist ideologies, spurred and triggered by the mass trophic biomagnification of endocrine and hormonal disrupting toxins up the food chain.

As we seriously begin to understand the HARD TRUTH about toxicology and diet, we will make it VERY CLEAR who the FITTEST and THE HEALTHIEST are, via evidence based clinical nutritional science.

In 2005, Syngenta opposed a Swiss ban on genetically engineered organisms.[13]On 28 November 2005, Switzerland enacted a five-year ban on the farming of genetically modified crops, underscoring the problems facing the European Commission and biotech companies like Syngenta, Bayer and Monsanto as they try to overcome consumer doubts about safety.[14]As of 2014 Syngenta's main competitors are Monsanto Company, BASF, Dow AgroSciences, Bayer CropScience and DuPont Pioneer.[15]In 2014, Monsanto sought to acquire Syngenta for a reported $40 billion, but Syngenta rejected the offer.[2][16] Since April 2015 Monsanto and Syngenta had been working with their investment banks Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachsrespectively on a deal. The U.S. Treasury tried to stop the deal for tax inversion.[17] Syngenta's Board of Directors rejected an even better offer by Monsanto during August 2015, and Monsanto withdrew from the negotiations on 26 August.[18]

Syngenta's contributions to US federal candidates, parties, and outside groups totaled $267,902 during 2012, ranking it 10th on the list of companies in its sector.[79] Its lobbying expenditures in the US during 2012 were $1,150,000, ranking it 7th in its sector.[80]

Berkeley – The nation's top-selling weed killer, atrazine, disrupts the sexual development of frogs at concentrations 30 times lower than levels allowed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), raising concerns about heavy use of the herbicide on corn, soybeans and other crops in the Midwest and around the world.

In an article in the April 16 issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,University of California, Berkeley, developmental endocrinologist Tyrone B. Hayes, associate professor of integrative biology, and his colleagues report that atrazine at levels often found in the environment demasculinizes tadpoles and turns them into hermaphrodites - creatures with both male and female sexual characteristics. The herbicide also lowers levels of the male hormone testosterone in sexually mature male frogs by a factor of 10, to levels lower than those in normal female frogs.

As Hayes later discovered, many atrazine-contaminated ponds in the Midwest contain native leopard frogs with the same abnormalities." http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2002/04/15_frogs.html

In 2006 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had stated that under the Food Quality Protection Act "the risks associated with the pesticide residues pose a reasonable certainty of no harm",[9] and in 2007, the EPA said that atrazine does not adversely affect amphibian sexual development and that no additional testing was warranted.[10]

EPA's 2009 review[11]concluded that "the agency's scientific bases for its regulation of atrazine are robust and ensure prevention of exposure levels that could lead to reproductive effects in humans".[12] EPA started a registration review in 2013.[13]The EPA's review has been criticized, and the safety of atrazine remains controversial.[2][8][14][15]

Scientists not on the payroll of Syngenta and other GMO manufacturers discovered the incidence of human birth defects was greatest during the months of April, May and June, which was when farmers used the greatest amount of atrazine annually.

“Atrazine is an endocrine disruptor. This means that micro-doses can have large, irreversible effects that we are just beginning to understand. New studies link low-level exposure to birth defects, delayed puberty and infertility — all of which are on the rise. Higher cancer risk and environmental toxicity are also of concern.

Birth Defects: Infants concieved during atrazine spray season are more likely to be born with birth defects. Research shows that even low levels of exposure during pregnancy may be problematic; the third trimester appears to be most critical.

Infertility: Documented reproductive harms include male infertility, increased risk of miscarriage, and low infant birth weight.

Cancer: Atrazine may increase risk of breast and prostate cancer. Though some studies have not found a link, the recent President’s Cancer Panel Report calls atrazine a possible carcinogen.

Scientists report that for atrazine, timing of exposure may be more important than exposure levels, and interaction with other pesticides may make health harms more severe.

Evidence of environmental effects is also strong and growing. Recent studies show that atrazine causes genetically male frogs to become anatomically female through a “chemical castration” effect.”

"Atrazine has been a suspected teratogen, with some studies reporting causing demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations,[46][47] and an estrogen disruptor.[48] A 2002 study by Tyrone Hayes, of the University of California, Berkeley, found that exposure caused male tadpoles to turn into hermaphrodites– frogs with both male and female sexual characteristics.[49] 

A 2003 EPA review of this study concluded that overcrowding, questionable sample handling techniques, and the failure of the authors to disclose key details including sample sizes, dose-response effects, and the variability of observed effects made it difficult to assess the study's credibility and ecological relevance.[50]

According to Hayes in 2004, all of the studies that rejected the hermaphroditismhypothesis were plagued by poor experimental controls and were funded by Syngenta, suggesting conflict of interest.[51]

A 2005 Syngenta-funded study, requested by EPA and conducted under EPA guidance and inspection, was unable to reproduce Hayes´ results.[52]"There has been a long running conflict between Syngenta and University of California at Berkeley biologist Tyrone Hayes.According to an article in the 10 February 2014, issue of The New Yorker,Syngenta's public-relations team took steps to discredit Hayes, whose research is purported to suggest that the Syngenta-produced chemical atrazine was responsible for abnormal development of reproductive organs in frogs. The article states that the company paid third-party critics to write articles discrediting Hayes's work, planned to have his wife investigated, and planted hostile audience members at scientific talks given by Hayes.[42]

During a 21 February interview conducted on Democracy Now, Hayes reiterated the claims.[74] After the interview aired, Syngenta denied targeting Hayes or making any threats, calling those statements "uncorroborated and intentionally damaging" and demanding a retraction and public apology from Hayes and Democracy Now.[75]

•POPs have an anthropogenic origin: industrial processes, waste (e.g. medical), traffic and agriculture. A few may be of natural origin, e.g. from volcanic eruptions.•POPs are released into air, water and land – from where they deposit into water, sediment, and enter the food-chain•POPs are globally distributed through the air and ocean currents – they travel long distances and enter into atmospheric processes, air– water exchange and cycles involving rain, snow and dry particles. These processes lead to the exposure of even remote populations of humans and animals that depend on aquatic foods. Humans and animals are exposed mainly via ingestion of contaminated aquatic foodstuffs.•POPs travel long distances and are found in places far away from industrial sites or from agricultural areas, such as the Arctic circle.

Over the last 30 years, since the end of the
Vietnam War, serious birth defects have been
common in Vietnam.  Scientists believe the dioxin
in Agent Orange is causing the birth defects.

Dioxins in the Food Supply
Which foods accumulate the highest levels of industrial toxins?

In addition to cancer, exposure to dioxin can also cause severe reproductive and developmental problems (at levels 100 times lower than those associated with its cancer causing effects).  Not only is dioxin considered a known human carcinogen, adverse health effects may include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, endometriosis, early menopause, reduced testosterone and thyroid hormones, altered metabolism and immune responses, and skin, tooth, and nail abnormalities. Exposure during pregnancy can result in altered thyroid, brain, immune system, and reproductive organ development.

How are we exposed to dioxin?

• It crosses the placenta… into the growing infant;
• It is present in the fatty breast milk, which is also a route of exposure which doses the infant, making breast-feeding for non-vegan/vegetarian (so called "omnivorous") mothers quite hazardous.
  
  

• 

• If you’re not vegan, this is where you are getting your dioxin from (and may god help you). 
  
  

Chart from EPA Dioxin Reassessment Summary 4/94 – Vol. 1, p. 37
(Figure II-5. Background TEQ exposures for North America by pathway)

[Chart from May 2001 study by Arnold Schecter et. al., Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 63:1–18]

Note: freshwater fish were farm-raised on a diet of meat, which is why they show the highestdioxinlevels in this study.

• Intake of Dioxins and Related Compounds from Food in the U.S. Population
  
  (May 2001 study in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health showing ongoing high levels of dioxins in meat and dairy products)
  
  
• How Toxic is Your Diet?
  
  
• Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds in the Food Supply: Strategies to Decrease Exposure(National Academy of Sciences, 2003)
  
  
• Dioxin/PCB contamination scandal in the Belgium and European food supply (1999)

Now, I dont want to give anyone the wrong impression, but I'm sure you've probably heard the term "degenerate" being used to sometimes degrade homosexuals.

The only reason I bring this up is in context of a POSSIBLE correlation between endocrine disruption and degeneration of the glandular system which produces our sex hormones and any imbalance and glandular weakness can most definitely have a strong affect on sexual function and expression (ESPECIALLY FROM OUR PARENTS STATE OF HEALTH DURING CONCEPTION AND GESTATION IN THE WOMB) as shown at the beginning of the article with mercury toxicity creating homosexual Ibis birds as an example.

Please dont think i'm attempting to label homosexuals or trans people as "degenerates", or in any way inherently wrong, immoral or any other sense that the word implies. They are not wrong or immoral for being gay. But like all of us, may have certain genetic and glandular dispositions that come into play. It would very easy for one to conflate examples such as Ellen DEGENERES whose surname De + Generare literally means "OF/FROM  INFERIOR GENE, STOCK," with DEGENERATE, and just so happens to be.... gay. This example of onomancy doesnt reflect well.  

Conception of a child is SUPPOSED to be a CONSCIOUS ACT and both parties have an OBLIGATION to themselves and the population to ENSURE that they have, and are, fully practicing and applying the science of detoxification of their bodies to ensure a fully functional and operative endocrine system so that all glands and organs are at full strength and capacity in order to pass down GOOD STRONG GENES (EUgenics) rather than continuing the degeneration of humanity (DISgenics).


This is no problem to fix, though, because healing occurs epi-genetically, which means "beyond or above the genes", meaning that genes which control the health and function of the cells are triggered by either positive or negative (acidic or alkaline) response to environmental stimuli, via our overall LIFESTYLE, and the changes can take effect almost IMMEDIATELY after making a change!

As soon as the cells are no longer bathed in their own metabolic waste with an acidic load for too long, and with proper detoxification, they will finally begin to either heal and regenerate, or die so they can be replaced by healthy cells proliferating, the same way that this applies to the macro scale in the human population, after all, we are only cells composing the body of the larger organism! This is BEAUTIFULL NEWS!! IT MEANS THAT WE ARE NOT VICTIMS OF OUR CULTURE OR OUR GENETICS! WE CONTROL OUR LIFESTYLE CHOICES AND WE CAN CHOOSE TO DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO CHANGE OUR LIFESTYLE! Check out Dr Robert Morse N.D.'s incredible "Detox Miracle Sourcebook: Raw Foods For Complete Cellular Regeneration" that employs HIGH ANTIOXIDANT and HIGH FIBER intake for cleansing, eliminating and rebuilding the body at a cellular level.



Wish my parents had known all the things I now know, in fact, ALL PARENTS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO KNOW! :)
Lifestyle Medicine: Treating the Causes of Disease

"The use of puberty blockers is needless and frivolous. It is even more outrageous when you consider the wealth of research that shows that most of these children will outgrow this condition. Consider the following studies:

*Dr. Paul McHugh cited studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic which showed that 70-80% of children with transgender feelings lost those feelings at some point in time and became comfortable with their birth gender. http://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-mchugh-transgender-surgery-isnt-the-solution-1402615120.

*Dr. Kenneth J. Zucker of the Clarke Institute in Toronto, Canada, treated about 500 pre-adolescent children with gender dysphoria over a period of 30 years. From his experience, about 80% of the children outgrew their gender dysphoria and accepted their original gender. http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/kenneth-zucker.html.

*A 2008 report in The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry says, “Most children with gender dysphoria will not remain gender dysphoric after puberty.”http://www.jaacap.com/article/S0890-8567(08)60142-2/abstract.

*Dr. Edgardo Menvielle treated transgender kids at Children’s National Medical Center in Washington, DC for about 10 years. He says that about 80% of the kids reclaim their birth gender, while the other 20% remained transgender into adulthood. https://www.washingtonpost.com/drug-treatments-for-transgender-kids-pose-difficult-choices-for-parents-doctors/2012/05/19/gIQAxgakbU_story.html.

*A 2015 report by Trombetta, Liguori, and Bertolotto says that in the majority of children, GID remits by adolescence, if not earlier. Follow-up studies of boys who have GID indicate that a desistance of GID with a co-occurring homosexual orientation is the most common outcome.

Trombetta, Liguori, and Bertolotto, Management of Gender Dysphoria, Springer, 2015.

*Gender Trender cites studies showing that only 2% of sex-role non-conforming children will end up seeking surgical sex change, and only about 15% will report some form of continued distress with sex roles post puberty. That means that 85% will end up being comfortable with their birth gender.

*Even The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) confirms this. WPATH is a pro-trans organization. In their own Standards of Care, they acknowledge that “only 6 to 23 per cent of boys and 12 to 27 per cent of girls treated in gender clinics showed persistence of their gender dysphoria into adulthood.” So 77-94% of the boys outgrew it and 73-88% of girls outgrew it. This organization is an ally of trans people, so it would be difficult to discredit their results. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265792166_Ethical_Issues_Raised_by_     the_Treatment_of_Gender-Variant_Prepubescent_Children.


     Here we have several credible studies, done by different researchers at different places and times, yet, they all got comparable results. So there is no doubt that the results are accurate.  These studies tell us what we should have already known: Most children who have gender dysphoria spontaneously lose those feelings. More than 50% of them outgrow it by adolescence, 80% outgrow it by adulthood, and 99% outgrow it by late adulthood. This is not a shocking result. It should be expected. These are elementary school kids. They will naturally grow up and change. We all have."

"Can a 9-year old child really make the decision to become sterile for life?  Sex-change treatment damages the body, stunts growth, and causes permanent sterility. Yet, children are being allowed to make the decision to undergo such drastic treatment. Inevitably, they will change their minds and regret it. Who will take responsibility? "

If a man goes to a psychiatrist and says, “Doc, I think I’m a chicken”, what will the psychiatrist do? Will he stick feathers in the man so he can look like a real chicken? Or will he try to convince the man that he is not really a chicken? Hopefully, he would pick the second choice. Does the first one make any sense at all? Of course not. It’s completely absurd. But it parallels the absurdity of a sex-change operation. If a man thinks he is a woman, he is clearly in a delusional state. Why would the psychiatrist feed the delusion instead of curing it? If he really wants to do what’s best for the man, he would try to help him deal with reality and accept himself for who he is. Transgenders are in a delusional state and are in need of counseling or therapy. To simply affirm their delusion is not helping them at all.

The condition that we are dealing with here is called gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is the magic bullet theory of transgenderism. It is a desperate attempt to make sense out of something that makes no sense at all. Like the magic bullet theory, it cannot withstand scrutiny. It seems almost semi-reasonable on the surface, but falls apart upon closer inspection. Supposedly, this is a medical condition that is “cured” by a sex-change operation. Let’s take a closer look at how gender dysphoria is defined:

     Gender Dysphoria: unhappiness with one's biological sex or its usual gender role, with the desire for the body and role of the opposite sex.

     A persistent unease with having the physical characteristics of one's gender, accompanied by strong identification with the opposite gender and a desire to live as or to become a member of the opposite gender.

Dissatisfaction or discomfort with one's phenotypic gender.[1]

     Notice the use of words like “unhappiness,” “unease,” “identification,” “dissatisfaction,” and “discomfort.” These are all words that indicate a psychological condition. There is no medical or physical confirmation of any of these symptoms. The diagnosis of gender dysphoria is based completely on how the patient feels. He is “unhappy” with his biological sex, or he is “dissatisfied” with his gender. But what medical tests are there to confirm this? Do blood tests show gender dysphoria? Does the CAT-Scan or MRI show gender dysphoria? Do the X-rays show that the patient is in the wrong body? No. Medically speaking, gender dysphoria is a phantom disease. There is no medical diagnosis for it. Because it is all based on the patient’s subjective experience, the only diagnosis is the patient’s own self-diagnosis. He feels like he’s in the wrong body, so he is. There is no test to show if that feeling is right or not. That feeling could be caused by things like trauma, stress, drugs, pressure, etc. In other words, that feeling could be wrong. Yet, that feeling is all that defines this condition.
[1] http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/gender+dysphoria.

Study and then apply proper #veganism, a whole plant food diet to eliminate 90% of your exposure to toxins and pathogens, but not just to LIMIT intake of them, but to actively DETOXIFY them from your system and maintain your biological birth gender (kidding, thats a joke!  but its true)  ;) Look forward my full video presentations coming soon!