This is a symbolic gesture of support. It is better than nothing, but won't get us very far towards our goals in open source medical or farming technology. It'll work for staying the course on pure open source telecom software, but not hardware.
This is a symbolic gesture of support. It is better than nothing, but won't get us very far towards our goals in open source medical or farming technology. It'll work for staying the course on pure open source telecom software, but not hardware.
This tier will get us pretty far if the non-profit grows quickly. At this level of support you can expect not only maintenance of existing open source telecom, but also additional upgrades and enhancements. However, if this is the highest level of support achieved, then our upgrades would be limited to only software.
This tier would also eventually (probably) support occasional in-person tech conferences and hackathons.
10$ is a significant contribution, and at this level of support you can expect not only maintenance of existing open source telecom, but also additional upgrades and enhancements. If this is the highest level of significant support achieved, you can expect frequent enhancements and upgrades, but still only to software.
However, depending on the number of consistent donors at this level, we could likely dip our toes into open source hardware collaborations; nevertheless, we would be unlikely to achieve the necessary level of support for anything involving the medical or farming robots.
This tier is also the cutoff where donor's enhancement requests will be prioritized and bumped up, provided they coincide with our core values, and are achievable relative to our liquidity and commitments.
This tier would also eventually (probably) support occasional in-person tech conferences and hackathons.
For $15 you can expect more frequent collaborations and more general software projects, branching out of pure telecom into other areas within our budget. Everything in lower tiers still applies, but I'd expect this to be the level that we can start branching out into multiple classes of software.
At this level, donors can begin suggesting specific new project starts, but we still have to act responsibly to maintain existing commitments, so there would likely not be many options, unless a lot of engineers join the project to work in free time (understand though, that expecting engineers to work for free is going to result in a lower quality of work that may incur excessive maintenance costs, and potentially become a liability down the line, so we prefer to pay our engineers and general contributors on active & supported projects).
If we gain a significant number of donors at this tier, it will be well within reach to begin projects involving open source robotic software and potentially even simple hardware configurations, likely not resulting in complete robots, but isolated systems that could be adapted to different applications.
An example of this would be a system that scans the surrounding area and detects when plants need to be watered, but it'd be unlikely that we could package a complete hardware solution without a significant number of donors. I'm sure something like this already exists, but we'd be offering all of the schematics and code in the open source repository. We would attempt to find an existing open source solution, and could then fork + improve existing code, while potentially collaborating with the project owners.
This level of contribution is extremely significant, and donors would be able to request their contribution go to a specific project (as long as it coincides with our core values) and that project only. Limitations would still exist for liquidity and existing commitments, but requests would be honored or a refund offered to the donor if no existing project suits their desires.