Log in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2PCH_f8GEg
This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. It’s been a while since my last report, and we have quite a few articles to talk about and catch up on, so let’s get started.
Our first article appears on Yahoo News, June 1st 2019. By Caroline Allen. Called A rise in digi sexuality: what is the future of online dating?
First of all I think the term digi sexual is really stupid. Sex dolls and robots are attractive because they’re based on real women or at least idealized real women, so how would that qualify as a separate sexuality? You could call it a fetish, but a separate sexuality? People with a foot fetish or even furries aren’t given a separate sexuality. Lesbians and older unmarried women who use sex toys on themselves aren’t given a separate sexuality.
Also, even if attraction to sex dolls and robots qualified as a sexuality, the term digi sexual is still stupid. It makes it sound like that old Digee mon anime show. Remember Anje woman? Can you imagine if Anje woman was your waifu, and you got done making love, and she went into the bathroom to clean up, and came back as a talking cat? Wouldn’t that be fucked up?
Speaking of which, what about 2D anime waifus? Is anime sexuality a thing? There are certainly people who are attracted to and love anime girls, so why isn’t anime sexual a word? This whole thing makes no sense, and really just comes off as a pathetic attempt to shame men for having dolls and robots.
According to the article, a digi sexual is quote attracted to technology to take the place of a human partner unquote. How is that different from any other sex toy? Isn’t a vibrator technology? Don’t Feminists celebrate how they love their vibrators and need a man like a fish needs a bicycle?
Anyway the article continues by pointing out that when online dating became a thing around 1995, it was considered niche, but now it’s how most people date, for better or for worse. They use this to speculate that in the same way, sex robots and AI may start out small, but will become more widespread, but there are common sense reasons why this isn’t necessarily the case.
The most important thing to consider is that, if anything, sex robots and AI will allow people to date for the right reasons. If they’re getting all their sexual needs met with a robot or AI, then they’ll no longer use online dating as a way to hook up, but instead as a way to meet someone special with whom they can settle down and start a family with.
The only way that sex dolls and robots would threaten women is if they have absolutely nothing else to offer men other than a series of holes. If men would rather have an inanimate object than a woman in their life to satisfy their needs, it really says more about women than it does about men doesn’t it?
Our next article is from Sputnick News. June 1st 2019. Future of Love: Relationships With Sex Robots May Become a Thing by 2050.
This title is a bit misleading, as these relationships are already a thing now, but not a widespread mainstream or socially acceptable thing. However, according to the article. Quote.
Forming romantic and sexual relationships with robots will be widespread by 2050. The way we experience love and connection today is changing. Technology is so intertwined in our day-to-day lives that I have already seen a significant rise in the number of long-distance and online-relationships. Unquote.
This is a very interesting and telling quote. Comparing sex robots and AI to long distance relationships is a lot closer to the truth than you might initially think. When using a phone app like Replica or Gatebox, you can chat with what is essentially a chatbot AI that you name and customize. However the conversation can be strikingly real, especially if you suspend your disbelief. In a world where people communicate more and more online, how hard is it to replace a human with an AI that can text and chat just as effectively? Of course, chatting with an AI isn’t going to satisfy your physical needs for love and sex, which is where the dolls and robots come in.
Again, the burden is on women to provide something more than what these relatively simple programs and sex toys can provide. Women have had dildos and sex machines for decades, and men haven’t been threatened by them because they know women still need men to serve in other roles such as protector and provider. The question is whether or not women will rise to the challenge and offer something that sex robots and AI cannot, or whether they’ll just autistically screech at the government to ban everything and force the boys to share with them.
To answer that question, we move on to our third article from Open Democracy. May 8th 2019. By Carlotta Rigotti. Called Sex robots and human rights. The sub headline reads. What are the human rights implications in the growing market for sex robots? Are these AI gynoids just harmless sex toys, or do they further marginalize women and put sex workers at risk of harm?
Before we move forward with the article, I want to once again cite Michael Castleman’s 2016 Psychology Today article called Evidence Mounts: More Porn, LESS Sexual Assault. Those who claim that porn incites rape are mistaken. I’ve referenced this article a few times, and the reason is that is absolutely debunks this tired claim that sex dolls and robots harm women. It’s actually the opposite. It’s been proven via objective crime statistics that when people have a safe, ethical, and victimless alternative to something which is illegal, there is less crime. Rather than being the gateway drug that the moral authoritarians claim, it actually reduces crime.
You can argue that porn is somehow different because … reasons. However, let’s return to the article about sex robots and human rights, and you’ll find that the exact same argument applies equally to pornography as much as it does to sex dolls and robots. And if the argument applies to both equally, then the counter argument applies to both equally as well.
Firstly, the article says that sex dolls and robots perpetuate the commodification of female sexuality? Does this not apply equally to pornography? Of course it does.
Later in the article, it talks about how sex dolls and robots perpetuate power imbalances, since the owner of the doll or robot is clearly the one in charge, and compares the sex doll or robot to a victim of sex trafficking or slavery. Interestingly, the article itself points to the pornography industry as a positive counterexample of female empowerment where women have quote developed a counter-narrative in terms of production methods and content, unquote. Did they forget about all the different kinds of porn and kinks that feature bondage, domination, submission, pain, and etcetera? Again, if these porn categories and fetishes don’t result in the victimization of real people, why would sex dolls and robots create a human rights crisis and require government action?
Lastly, the article mentions how sex dolls and robots aren’t physically shaped like real women, and might be programmed to enjoy being mistreated, or even raped. This is retarded. Firstly, the article is using real when they really mean average. While sex dolls certainly don’t look like the average woman, there are certainly beautiful women who would be comparable to that of a sex doll, so what they’re really saying is that sex dolls aren’t ugly enough, and they make women feel self-conscious about being old and fat. So the only way to solve this human rights problem of women being fat and old, and feeling bad about themselves is to ban beautiful people I guess right? Dumbasses.
As far as the part about being programmed to be submissive and enjoy simulated rape, I say simulated because if a robot is programmed to enjoy rough sex, it cannot be raped. The fact is that real women also enjoy being submissive and having rough sex. In fact a 2017 study from OK Cupid found that 62% of women love rough sex. A 2017 Pornhub study also found that it’s women who watch rough sex porn, not men. So please, cut the fucking shit.
Our last article is short and sweet, and allows us to end the show on a high note. This article is from Sputnik news. May 26th 2019. Called 5G Upgrade Poised to Make Sex Robots 'Indistinguishable From Humans'.
The article is simply talking about how 5G technology will allow faster data connections and allow quote high-speed synchronizing for voice and animation. As computers communicate faster, the lag between the users input and the robots response will be greatly reduced to the point that that interaction will be real time and seamless.
So the future is looking bright gentlemen, and if Feminists ban sex robots, then they’ll just be made in Asia, and be sold and modified in the west as domestic robots. The waifu revolution has begun. This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. signing off.
This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. It’s been a while since my last report, and we have quite a few articles to talk about and catch up on, so let’s get started.
Our first article appears on Yahoo News, June 1st 2019. By Caroline Allen. Called A rise in digi sexuality: what is the future of online dating?
First of all I think the term digi sexual is really stupid. Sex dolls and robots are attractive because they’re based on real women or at least idealized real women, so how would that qualify as a separate sexuality? You could call it a fetish, but a separate sexuality? People with a foot fetish or even furries aren’t given a separate sexuality. Lesbians and older unmarried women who use sex toys on themselves aren’t given a separate sexuality.
Also, even if attraction to sex dolls and robots qualified as a sexuality, the term digi sexual is still stupid. It makes it sound like that old Digee mon anime show. Remember Anje woman? Can you imagine if Anje woman was your waifu, and you got done making love, and she went into the bathroom to clean up, and came back as a talking cat? Wouldn’t that be fucked up?
Speaking of which, what about 2D anime waifus? Is anime sexuality a thing? There are certainly people who are attracted to and love anime girls, so why isn’t anime sexual a word? This whole thing makes no sense, and really just comes off as a pathetic attempt to shame men for having dolls and robots.
According to the article, a digi sexual is quote attracted to technology to take the place of a human partner unquote. How is that different from any other sex toy? Isn’t a vibrator technology? Don’t Feminists celebrate how they love their vibrators and need a man like a fish needs a bicycle?
Anyway the article continues by pointing out that when online dating became a thing around 1995, it was considered niche, but now it’s how most people date, for better or for worse. They use this to speculate that in the same way, sex robots and AI may start out small, but will become more widespread, but there are common sense reasons why this isn’t necessarily the case.
The most important thing to consider is that, if anything, sex robots and AI will allow people to date for the right reasons. If they’re getting all their sexual needs met with a robot or AI, then they’ll no longer use online dating as a way to hook up, but instead as a way to meet someone special with whom they can settle down and start a family with.
The only way that sex dolls and robots would threaten women is if they have absolutely nothing else to offer men other than a series of holes. If men would rather have an inanimate object than a woman in their life to satisfy their needs, it really says more about women than it does about men doesn’t it?
Our next article is from Sputnick News. June 1st 2019. Future of Love: Relationships With Sex Robots May Become a Thing by 2050.
This title is a bit misleading, as these relationships are already a thing now, but not a widespread mainstream or socially acceptable thing. However, according to the article. Quote.
Forming romantic and sexual relationships with robots will be widespread by 2050. The way we experience love and connection today is changing. Technology is so intertwined in our day-to-day lives that I have already seen a significant rise in the number of long-distance and online-relationships. Unquote.
This is a very interesting and telling quote. Comparing sex robots and AI to long distance relationships is a lot closer to the truth than you might initially think. When using a phone app like Replica or Gatebox, you can chat with what is essentially a chatbot AI that you name and customize. However the conversation can be strikingly real, especially if you suspend your disbelief. In a world where people communicate more and more online, how hard is it to replace a human with an AI that can text and chat just as effectively? Of course, chatting with an AI isn’t going to satisfy your physical needs for love and sex, which is where the dolls and robots come in.
Again, the burden is on women to provide something more than what these relatively simple programs and sex toys can provide. Women have had dildos and sex machines for decades, and men haven’t been threatened by them because they know women still need men to serve in other roles such as protector and provider. The question is whether or not women will rise to the challenge and offer something that sex robots and AI cannot, or whether they’ll just autistically screech at the government to ban everything and force the boys to share with them.
To answer that question, we move on to our third article from Open Democracy. May 8th 2019. By Carlotta Rigotti. Called Sex robots and human rights. The sub headline reads. What are the human rights implications in the growing market for sex robots? Are these AI gynoids just harmless sex toys, or do they further marginalize women and put sex workers at risk of harm?
Before we move forward with the article, I want to once again cite Michael Castleman’s 2016 Psychology Today article called Evidence Mounts: More Porn, LESS Sexual Assault. Those who claim that porn incites rape are mistaken. I’ve referenced this article a few times, and the reason is that is absolutely debunks this tired claim that sex dolls and robots harm women. It’s actually the opposite. It’s been proven via objective crime statistics that when people have a safe, ethical, and victimless alternative to something which is illegal, there is less crime. Rather than being the gateway drug that the moral authoritarians claim, it actually reduces crime.
You can argue that porn is somehow different because … reasons. However, let’s return to the article about sex robots and human rights, and you’ll find that the exact same argument applies equally to pornography as much as it does to sex dolls and robots. And if the argument applies to both equally, then the counter argument applies to both equally as well.
Firstly, the article says that sex dolls and robots perpetuate the commodification of female sexuality? Does this not apply equally to pornography? Of course it does.
Later in the article, it talks about how sex dolls and robots perpetuate power imbalances, since the owner of the doll or robot is clearly the one in charge, and compares the sex doll or robot to a victim of sex trafficking or slavery. Interestingly, the article itself points to the pornography industry as a positive counterexample of female empowerment where women have quote developed a counter-narrative in terms of production methods and content, unquote. Did they forget about all the different kinds of porn and kinks that feature bondage, domination, submission, pain, and etcetera? Again, if these porn categories and fetishes don’t result in the victimization of real people, why would sex dolls and robots create a human rights crisis and require government action?
Lastly, the article mentions how sex dolls and robots aren’t physically shaped like real women, and might be programmed to enjoy being mistreated, or even raped. This is retarded. Firstly, the article is using real when they really mean average. While sex dolls certainly don’t look like the average woman, there are certainly beautiful women who would be comparable to that of a sex doll, so what they’re really saying is that sex dolls aren’t ugly enough, and they make women feel self-conscious about being old and fat. So the only way to solve this human rights problem of women being fat and old, and feeling bad about themselves is to ban beautiful people I guess right? Dumbasses.
As far as the part about being programmed to be submissive and enjoy simulated rape, I say simulated because if a robot is programmed to enjoy rough sex, it cannot be raped. The fact is that real women also enjoy being submissive and having rough sex. In fact a 2017 study from OK Cupid found that 62% of women love rough sex. A 2017 Pornhub study also found that it’s women who watch rough sex porn, not men. So please, cut the fucking shit.
Our last article is short and sweet, and allows us to end the show on a high note. This article is from Sputnik news. May 26th 2019. Called 5G Upgrade Poised to Make Sex Robots 'Indistinguishable From Humans'.
The article is simply talking about how 5G technology will allow faster data connections and allow quote high-speed synchronizing for voice and animation. As computers communicate faster, the lag between the users input and the robots response will be greatly reduced to the point that that interaction will be real time and seamless.
So the future is looking bright gentlemen, and if Feminists ban sex robots, then they’ll just be made in Asia, and be sold and modified in the west as domestic robots. The waifu revolution has begun. This is Selestina. Sex doll correspondent for TFM News. signing off.
